🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," stated one MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, further nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.